You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Automated Clinical Exome Reanalysis Reveals Novel Diagnoses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.07.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel W Baker, Jill R Murrell, Addie I Nesbitt, Kieran B Pechter, Jorune Balciuniene, Xiaonan Zhao, Zhenming Yu, Elizabeth H Denenberg, Elizabeth T DeChene, Alisha B Wilkens, Elizabeth J Bhoj, Qiaoning Guan, Matthew C Dulik, Laura K Conlin, Ahmad N Abou Tayoun, Minjie Luo, Chao Wu, Kajia Cao, Mahdi Sarmady, Emma C Bedoukian, Jennifer Tarpinian, Livija Medne, Cara M Skraban, Matthew A Deardorff, Ian D Krantz, Bryan L Krock, Avni B Santani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 84 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 35 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 38 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
#931
of 1,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,536
of 452,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,331 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.