| Title |
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome: a prospective observational comparative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-2021-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antoine Roch, Renaud Lepaul-Ercole, Dominique Grisoli, Jacques Bessereau, Olivier Brissy, Matthias Castanier, Stephanie Dizier, Jean-Marie Forel, Christophe Guervilly, Vlad Gariboldi, Frederic Collart, Pierre Michelet, Gilles Perrin, Remi Charrel, Laurent Papazian |
| Abstract |
To compare characteristics, clinical evolution and outcome in adult patients with influenza A (H1N1) acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated with or without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 25 | 24% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 73% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2011.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,615
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,517
of 94,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#12
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.