You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relative Merits of Left Ventricular Dyssynchrony, Left Ventricular Lead Position, and Myocardial Scar to Predict Long-Term Survival of Ischemic Heart Failure Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circulationaha.110.945345 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Victoria Delgado, Rutger J. van Bommel, Matteo Bertini, C. Jan Willem Borleffs, Nina Ajmone Marsan, Arnold C.T. Ng, Gaetano Nucifora, Nico R.L. van de Veire, Claudia Ypenburg, Eric Boersma, Eduard R. Holman, Martin J. Schalij, Jeroen J. Bax |
| Abstract |
The relative merits of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, LV lead position, and myocardial scar to predict long-term outcome after cardiac resynchronization therapy remain unknown and were evaluated in the present study. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 111 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 16% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 22% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 59% |
| Engineering | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#7,980
of 21,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,898
of 192,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#42
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.