↓ Skip to main content

Prospective Validation Study of a Predictive Score for Operability of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 3,401)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
242 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prospective Validation Study of a Predictive Score for Operability of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer
Published in
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, January 2011
DOI 10.1097/igc.0b013e31820aaafd
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Harter, Jalid Sehouli, Alexander Reuss, Annette Hasenburg, Giovanni Scambia, David Cibula, Sven Mahner, Ignace Vergote, Alexander Reinthaller, Alexander Burges, Lars Hanker, Martin Pölcher, Christian Kurzeder, Ulrich Canzler, Karl Ulrich Petry, Andreas Obermair, Edgar Petru, Barbara Schmalfeldt, Domenica Lorusso, Andreas du Bois

Abstract

The DESKTOP I trial proposed a score for the prediction of complete cytoreduction in recurrent ovarian cancer. Resectability was assumed if 3 factors were present: (1) complete resection at first surgery, (2) good performance status, and (3) absence of ascites. The DESKTOP II trial was planned to verify this hypothesis prospectively in a multicenter setting.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 117 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 15 12%
Other 13 11%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 28 23%
Unknown 30 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 37 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#907,022
of 25,305,422 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
#28
of 3,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,170
of 193,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,305,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.