↓ Skip to main content

Wild bees and urban agriculture: assessing pollinator supply and demand across urban landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in Urban Ecosystems, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
Title
Wild bees and urban agriculture: assessing pollinator supply and demand across urban landscapes
Published in
Urban Ecosystems, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s11252-019-0826-6
Authors

Chang Zhao, Heather A. Sander, Stephen D. Hendrix

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 151 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 32%
Environmental Science 37 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 47 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,937,662
of 23,152,542 outputs
Outputs from Urban Ecosystems
#414
of 732 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,357
of 437,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Urban Ecosystems
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,152,542 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 732 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.