| Title |
How to use fitness landscape models for the analysis of collective decision-making: a case of theory-transfer and its limitations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology & Philosophy, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10539-018-9669-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Marks, Lasse Gerrits, Johannes Marx |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 23 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 22% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 22% |
| Engineering | 3 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 9% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 22% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,573,178
of 25,032,929 outputs
Outputs from Biology & Philosophy
#307
of 712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,802
of 448,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology & Philosophy
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,032,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 712 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,681 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.