↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of the amount of shark landing by species in the main fishing ports of Japan

Overview of attention for article published in NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimation of the amount of shark landing by species in the main fishing ports of Japan
Published in
NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI, January 2003
DOI 10.2331/suisan.69.178
Authors

HIROAKI MATSUNAGA, HIDEKI NAKANO, YOUICHIROU ISHIBASHI, KENPEI NAKAYAMA

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 75%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2020.
All research outputs
#16,048,009
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#729
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,875
of 136,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIPPON SUISAN GAKKAISHI
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.