| Title |
Reasoning as we read: Establishing the probability of causal conditionals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory & Cognition, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13421-012-0250-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Haigh, Andrew J. Stewart, Louise Connell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Professor | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 50% |
| Linguistics | 4 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,357,941
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#947
of 1,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,091
of 169,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#15
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.