| Title |
Current SWD IPM tactics and their practical implementation in fruit crops across different regions around the world
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pest Science, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10340-016-0737-8 |
| Authors |
T. Haye, P. Girod, A. G. S. Cuthbertson, X. G. Wang, K. M. Daane, K. A. Hoelmer, C. Baroffio, J. P. Zhang, N. Desneux |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 7% |
| Unknown | 51 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 101 | 50% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Psychology | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 59 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,837,744
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pest Science
#127
of 534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,448
of 400,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pest Science
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.