| Title |
Blind prediction of host–guest binding affinities: a new SAMPL3 challenge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10822-012-9554-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hari S. Muddana, C. Daniel Varnado, Christopher W. Bielawski, Adam R. Urbach, Lyle Isaacs, Matthew T. Geballe, Michael K. Gilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 41 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,331,161
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#175
of 949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,662
of 168,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.