↓ Skip to main content

p53 regulates maternal reproduction through LIF

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
381 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
p53 regulates maternal reproduction through LIF
Published in
Nature, November 2007
DOI 10.1038/nature05993
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenwei Hu, Zhaohui Feng, Angelika K. Teresky, Arnold J. Levine

Abstract

Extensive studies have shown that p53 is important in tumour prevention. However, little is known about its normal physiological function. Here we show that p53 is important in reproduction, in a gender-specific manner. Significant decreases in embryonic implantation, pregnancy rate and litter size were observed in matings with p53-/- female mice but not with p53-/- male mice. The gene encoding leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), a cytokine critical for implantation, was identified as a p53-regulated gene that functions as the downstream mediator of this effect. p53 can regulate both basal and inducible transcription of LIF. Loss of p53 decreased both the level and function of LIF in uteri. Lower LIF levels were observed in the uteri of p53-/- mice than in those of p53+/+ mice, particularly at day 4 of pregnancy, when transiently induced high levels of LIF were crucial for embryonic implantation. This observation probably accounts for the impaired implantation of embryos in p53-/- female mice. Administration of LIF to pregnant p53-/- mice restored maternal reproduction by improving implantation. These results demonstrate a function for p53 in maternal reproduction through the regulation of LIF. Evidence is accumulating that p53 may have a similar function in humans.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 4 2%
France 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 210 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 23%
Researcher 47 21%
Student > Master 22 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 7%
Other 43 19%
Unknown 28 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 60 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 15 7%
Unknown 31 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#62,289
of 90,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,275
of 155,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#392
of 523 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,600 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 523 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.