Title |
Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11051-008-9360-9 |
Authors |
Jan Youtie, Philip Shapira, Alan L. Porter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 8% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Mexico | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 78 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 32% |
Researcher | 13 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 12% |
Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 18% |
Unknown | 6 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 18 | 20% |
Chemistry | 12 | 13% |
Engineering | 12 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 7% |
Other | 26 | 29% |
Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,752,350
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#187
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,475
of 158,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.