Title |
Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and Optos™ systems
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Ophthalmology, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12886-018-1011-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Takao Hirano, Akira Imai, Hirotsugu Kasamatsu, Shinji Kakihara, Yuichi Toriyama, Toshinori Murata |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 20% |
Other | 6 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
Engineering | 3 | 6% |
Chemistry | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#2,213
of 2,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#391,614
of 450,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.