↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and Optos™ systems

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two ultra-wide-field fundus imaging systems, the Clarus® and Optos™ systems
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12886-018-1011-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takao Hirano, Akira Imai, Hirotsugu Kasamatsu, Shinji Kakihara, Yuichi Toriyama, Toshinori Murata

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Other 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 17 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 14 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#2,213
of 2,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#391,614
of 450,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.