| Title |
The role and scope of practice of midwives in humanitarian settings: a systematic review and content analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12960-018-0341-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristen Beek, Alison McFadden, Angela Dawson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 14 | 41% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 71% |
| Scientists | 7 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 199 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 81 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 83 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,012,405
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#69
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,749
of 446,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.