You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Ewing Family of Tumors Relies on BCL-2 and BCL-XL to Escape PARP Inhibitor Toxicity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-0277 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel A.R. Heisey, Timothy L. Lochmann, Konstantinos V. Floros, Colin M. Coon, Krista M. Powell, Sheeba Jacob, Marissa L. Calbert, Maninderjit S. Ghotra, Giovanna T. Stein, Yuki Kato Maves, Steven C. Smith, Cyril H. Benes, Joel D. Leverson, Andrew J. Souers, Sosipatros A. Boikos, Anthony C. Faber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#18,663,380
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#11,480
of 12,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,342
of 354,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#215
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.