↓ Skip to main content

A new method for isolating large quantities of Arabidopsis trichomes for transcriptome, cell wall and other types of analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Journal, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A new method for isolating large quantities of Arabidopsis trichomes for transcriptome, cell wall and other types of analyses
Published in
Plant Journal, October 2008
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2008.03611.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. David Marks, Lissete Betancur, Edward Gilding, Fang Chen, Stefan Bauer, Jonathan P. Wenger, Richard A. Dixon, Candace H. Haigler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
India 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 107 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 27%
Researcher 29 25%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 20 17%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Psychology 1 <1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 17 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2008.
All research outputs
#17,700,438
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Plant Journal
#6,117
of 7,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,154
of 106,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Journal
#66
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.