| Title |
Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Are We Winning the Battle But Losing the War?∗
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.095 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andre d’Avila, Sheldon M. Singh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 44% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 33% |
| Engineering | 2 | 11% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2020.
All research outputs
#660,815
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,700
of 16,740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,067
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#20
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.