↓ Skip to main content

Diprosopus: a review of the aetiology and case report of early surgery in a 7-week-old infant with partial facial duplication

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Plastic Surgery, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Diprosopus: a review of the aetiology and case report of early surgery in a 7-week-old infant with partial facial duplication
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00238-019-1495-7
Authors

Sieglinde Erica Rabe, Mahendra Daya, Anil Madaree

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,557,299
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#255
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,639
of 438,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.