| Title |
Infarcted Warthin tumor with mucoepidermoid carcinoma-like metaplasia: a case report and review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13256-018-1941-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenji Yorita, Hideyuki Nakagawa, Katsushi Miyazaki, Junya Fukuda, Satoshi Ito, Makoto Kosai |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 39% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,557,299
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,529
of 3,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,639
of 438,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#27
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,972 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.