| Title |
Engaging environmental policy-makers with systematic reviews: challenges, solutions and lessons learned
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-018-0144-0 |
| Authors |
Alexandra M. Collins, Deborah Coughlin, Nicola Randall |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 39% |
| South Africa | 4 | 14% |
| Canada | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,271,048
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#90
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,716
of 449,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.