You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep-intronic ABCA4 variants explain missing heritability in Stargardt disease and allow correction of splice defects by antisense oligonucleotides
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-018-0414-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riccardo Sangermano, Alejandro Garanto, Mubeen Khan, Esmee H. Runhart, Miriam Bauwens, Nathalie M. Bax, L. Ingeborgh van den Born, Muhammad Imran Khan, Stéphanie S. Cornelis, Joke B. G. M. Verheij, Jan-Willem R. Pott, Alberta A. H. J. Thiadens, Caroline C. W. Klaver, Bernard Puech, Isabelle Meunier, Sarah Naessens, Gavin Arno, Ana Fakin, Keren J. Carss, F. Lucy Raymond, Andrew R. Webster, Claire-Marie Dhaenens, Heidi Stöhr, Felix Grassmann, Bernhard H. F. Weber, Carel B. Hoyng, Elfride De Baere, Silvia Albert, Rob W. J. Collin, Frans P. M. Cremers |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 19% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 67% |
| Scientists | 10 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 118 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 11% |
| Philosophy | 1 | <1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,012,861
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#299
of 2,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,563
of 463,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#10
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,945 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 463,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.