| Title |
Local Recurrence of Benign, Borderline, and Malignant Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-018-07134-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yiwen Lu, Yanbo Chen, Liling Zhu, Paul Cartwright, Erwei Song, Lisa Jacobs, Kai Chen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 20% |
| Mexico | 6 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 6% |
| Spain | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 6% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 20% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,270,995
of 25,083,571 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#161
of 7,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,587
of 448,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#6
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,083,571 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.