↓ Skip to main content

The Expectations and Challenges of Wildlife Disease Research in the Era of Genomics: Forecasting with a Horizon Scan-like Exercise

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Heredity, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Expectations and Challenges of Wildlife Disease Research in the Era of Genomics: Forecasting with a Horizon Scan-like Exercise
Published in
Journal of Heredity, January 2019
DOI 10.1093/jhered/esz001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert R Fitak, Jennifer D Antonides, Eric J Baitchman, Elisa Bonaccorso, Josephine Braun, Steven Kubiski, Elliott Chiu, Anna C Fagre, Roderick B Gagne, Justin S Lee, Jennifer L Malmberg, Mark D Stenglein, Robert J Dusek, David Forgacs, Nicholas M Fountain-Jones, Marie L J Gilbertson, Katherine E L Worsley-Tonks, W Chris Funk, Daryl R Trumbo, Bruno M Ghersi, Wray Grimaldi, Sara E Heisel, Claire M Jardine, Pauline L Kamath, Dibesh Karmacharya, Christopher P Kozakiewicz, Simona Kraberger, Dagan A Loisel, Cait McDonald, Steven Miller, Devon O’Rourke, Caitlin N Ott-Conn, Mónica Páez-Vacas, Alison J Peel, Wendy C Turner, Meredith C VanAcker, Sue VandeWoude, Jill Pecon-Slattery

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 102 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 15%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Professor 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 25%
Environmental Science 10 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Other 19 19%
Unknown 32 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,172,653
of 24,707,218 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Heredity
#80
of 1,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,804
of 447,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Heredity
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,707,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.