You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Conceptualizing Ecological Responses to Dam Removal: If You Remove It, What's to Come?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BioScience, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biy152 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
J Ryan Bellmore, George R Pess, Jeffrey J Duda, Jim E O’Connor, Amy E East, Melissa M Foley, Andrew C Wilcox, Jon J Major, Patrick B Shafroth, Sarah A Morley, Christopher S Magirl, Chauncey W Anderson, James E Evans, Christian E Torgersen, laura S Craig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 27 | 47% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
Canada | 4 | 7% |
France | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Hungary | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 35 | 60% |
Scientists | 22 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 36 | 18% |
Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 8% |
Professor | 9 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 13% |
Unknown | 53 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 58 | 29% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 21% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 7% |
Engineering | 10 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 4% |
Unknown | 66 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#283,899
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#102
of 2,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,135
of 448,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.