You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of Adjunctive Bioactive Materials in the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioMed Research International, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2018/8670832 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shuai Zhou, Chengjia Sun, Shaohui Huang, Ximing Wu, Yan Zhao, Chunling Pan, Hongyan Wang, Junchao Liu, Qian Li, Yurong Kou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 63 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 65 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,068,416
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from BioMed Research International
#1,977
of 9,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,822
of 330,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMed Research International
#31
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.