↓ Skip to main content

Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
Title
Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12884-018-2168-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexandra Cernat, Chante De Freitas, Umair Majid, Forum Trivedi, Caroline Higgins, Meredith Vanstone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 9%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 10 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 82 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 6%
Unspecified 6 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 89 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,829,536
of 23,788,679 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#778
of 4,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,233
of 442,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#28
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,788,679 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.