| Title |
Patients’ preferences for osteoarthritis treatment: the value of stated-preference studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40520-018-1098-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mickael Hiligsmann, Daniel Pinto, Elaine Dennison, Nasser Al-Daghri, Charlotte Beaudart, Jaime Branco, Olivier Bruyère, Philip G. Conaghan, Cyrus Cooper, Gabriel Herrero-Beaumont, Famida Jiwa, Willem Lems, Rene Rizzoli, Thierry Thomas, Nicola Veronese, Jean-Yves Reginster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Librarian | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#1,238
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,657
of 445,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#34
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.