↓ Skip to main content

‘Real-life’ analysis of the role of antifungal prophylaxis in preventing invasive aspergillosis in AML patients undergoing consolidation therapy: Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni nelle Emopatie (S…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Real-life’ analysis of the role of antifungal prophylaxis in preventing invasive aspergillosis in AML patients undergoing consolidation therapy: Sorveglianza Epidemiologica Infezioni nelle Emopatie (SEIFEM) 2016 study
Published in
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), January 2019
DOI 10.1093/jac/dky550
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Ilaria Del Principe, Giulia Dragonetti, Luisa Verga, Anna Candoni, Francesco Marchesi, Chiara Cattaneo, Mario Delia, Leonardo Potenza, Francesca Farina, Stelvio Ballanti, Nunzia Decembrino, Carlo Castagnola, Gianpaolo Nadali, Rosa Fanci, Enrico Orciulo, Barbara Veggia, Massimo Offidani, Lorella Melillo, Sara Manetta, Mario Tumbarello, Adriano Venditti, Alessandro Busca, Franco Aversa, Livio Pagano, Roberta Della Pepa, Antonella Ferrari, Monica Piedimonte, Ospedale S Andrea, Nicola S Fracchiolla, Mariarita Sciumè, Federica Lessi, Lucia Prezioso, Angelica Spolzino, Benedetta Rambaldi, Domenico Russo, Cattedra di Ematologia, Laura Maracci, Chiara Sarlo, Ombretta Annibali, Mariagiovanna Cefalo, Annagiulia Zizzari, Roberta Di Blasi, Daniele Zama, Valentina Mancini, Prassede Salutari, Simone Cesaro, Maria Grazia Garzia, Adriana Vacca, Michela Dargenio, Rosangela Invernizzi, Katia Perruccio, Angela Maria Quinto, Anna Chierichini, Antonio Spadea

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Unspecified 1 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 47%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 9 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,608,799
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#5,407
of 8,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,439
of 446,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#83
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.