↓ Skip to main content

Amino acid contacts in proteins adapted to different temperatures: hydrophobic interactions and surface charges play a key role

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Amino acid contacts in proteins adapted to different temperatures: hydrophobic interactions and surface charges play a key role
Published in
Extremophiles, September 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00792-008-0192-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gisle Sælensminde, Øyvind Halskau, Inge Jonassen

Abstract

Thermophiles, mesophiles, and psychrophiles have different amino acid frequencies in their proteins, probably because of the way the species adapt to very different temperatures in their environment. In this paper, we analyse how contacts between sidechains vary between homologous proteins from species that are adapted to different temperatures, but displaying relatively high sequence similarity. We investigate whether specific contacts between amino acids sidechains is a key factor in thermostabilisation in proteins. The dataset was divided into two subsets with optimal growth temperatures from 0-40 and 35-102 degrees C. Comparison of homologues was made between low-temperature species and high-temperature species within each subset. We found that unspecific interactions like hydrophobic interactions in the core and solvent interactions and entropic effects at the surface, appear to be more important factors than specific contact types like salt bridges and aromatic clusters.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
Italy 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Estonia 1 1%
Unknown 87 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 28%
Researcher 19 20%
Professor 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Master 8 9%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 30%
Chemistry 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2009.
All research outputs
#15,240,835
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#543
of 799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,159
of 88,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 799 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.