| Title |
Who knows best? A Q methodology study to explore perspectives of professional stakeholders and community participants on health in low-income communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12913-019-3884-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Neil McHugh, Rachel Baker, Olga Biosca, Fatma Ibrahim, Cam Donaldson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 78% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 24 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,203,644
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,486
of 8,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,745
of 446,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#72
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.