| Title |
Patient and primary care delays in the diagnostic pathway of gynaecological cancers: a systematic review of influencing factors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x700781 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pauline Williams, Peter Murchie, Christine Bond |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 59% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,169,723
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,052
of 4,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,175
of 438,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#35
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,328 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.