You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Human Tick-Borne Diseases in Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mona Dehhaghi, Hamed Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Edward C. Holmes, Bernard J. Hudson, Richard Schloeffel, Gilles J. Guillemin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 109 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,121,755
of 25,432,721 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#189
of 8,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,610
of 446,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,432,721 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,106 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.