| Title |
The transition to non-lead sporting ammunition and fishing weights: Review of progress and barriers to implementation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ambio, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13280-018-1132-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vernon G. Thomas, Niels Kanstrup, Anthony D. Fox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 47 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 23% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#369,090
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#33
of 1,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,158
of 447,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#1
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.