↓ Skip to main content

A novel strategy for NMR resonance assignment and protein structure determination

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomolecular NMR, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel strategy for NMR resonance assignment and protein structure determination
Published in
Journal of Biomolecular NMR, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10858-010-9458-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander Lemak, Aleksandras Gutmanas, Seth Chitayat, Murthy Karra, Christophe Farès, Maria Sunnerhagen, Cheryl H. Arrowsmith

Abstract

The quality of protein structures determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy is contingent on the number and quality of experimentally-derived resonance assignments, distance and angular restraints. Two key features of protein NMR data have posed challenges for the routine and automated structure determination of small to medium sized proteins; (1) spectral resolution - especially of crowded nuclear Overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) spectra, and (2) the reliance on a continuous network of weak scalar couplings as part of most common assignment protocols. In order to facilitate NMR structure determination, we developed a semi-automated strategy that utilizes non-uniform sampling (NUS) and multidimensional decomposition (MDD) for optimal data collection and processing of selected, high resolution multidimensional NMR experiments, combined it with an ABACUS protocol for sequential and side chain resonance assignments, and streamlined this procedure to execute structure and refinement calculations in CYANA and CNS, respectively. Two graphical user interfaces (GUIs) were developed to facilitate efficient analysis and compilation of the data and to guide automated structure determination. This integrated method was implemented and refined on over 30 high quality structures of proteins ranging from 5.5 to 16.5 kDa in size.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Poland 1 1%
Unknown 66 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Researcher 15 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 23%
Chemistry 16 23%
Computer Science 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2018.
All research outputs
#6,377,613
of 22,660,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#107
of 614 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,971
of 180,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomolecular NMR
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,660,862 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 614 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them