↓ Skip to main content

Active commuting and perceptions of the route environment: A longitudinal analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Preventive Medicine, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Active commuting and perceptions of the route environment: A longitudinal analysis
Published in
Preventive Medicine, July 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenna Panter, Simon Griffin, David Ogilvie

Abstract

To assess associations between changes in perceptions of the environment en route to work and changes in active commuting. 655 commuters in Cambridge, UK reported perceptions of their commuting route and past-week commuting trips in postal questionnaires in 2009 and 2010. Associations between changes in route perceptions and changes in time spent walking and cycling, proportion of car trips, and switching to or from the car on the commute were modelled using multivariable regression. Changes in only a few perceptions were associated with changes in travel behaviour. Commuters who reported that it became less pleasant to walk recorded a 6% (95% CI: 1, 11) net increase in car trips and a 12 min/week (95% CI: -1, -24) net decrease in walking. Increases in the perceived danger of cycling or of crossing the road were also associated with increases in car trips. Increases in the perceived convenience of public transport (OR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.27, 8.63) or safety of cycling (OR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.44, 9.50) were associated with taking up alternatives to the car. Interventions to improve the safety of routes and convenience of public transport may help promote active commuting and should be evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 121 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 21%
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 34 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 12%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Engineering 10 8%
Sports and Recreations 8 6%
Environmental Science 5 4%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 46 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2017.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Preventive Medicine
#4,634
of 5,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,937
of 239,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Preventive Medicine
#63
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.