↓ Skip to main content

Genotypes and Distance Running

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Genotypes and Distance Running
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200737040-00039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert A. Scott, Yannis P. Pitsiladis

Abstract

A look at the medal podium in almost any international sporting competition reveals that some athletes and certain countries enjoy regular success in particular events. While environmental influences such as training and diet are important, it is likely that there is also some genetic component to elite athletic performance. One of the most compelling examples of athletic domination is that of east African runners in international distance running competition. This phenomenon has led to the suggestion that east Africans possess some inherent genetic advantage predisposing them to superior athletic performances. The concurrent success of athletes of west African ancestry in sprint events also appears to have augmented this belief given their similar skin colour. A growing body of evidence suggests that genetic variation does influence athletic performance, yet despite the speculation that African athletes have a genetic advantage for physical performance, there is no genetic evidence to suggest that this is the case. The only available genetic studies of elite African athletes do not find that these athletes possess a unique genetic makeup; rather, they serve to highlight the high degree of genetic diversity in east African populations and also among elite east African athletes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 4%
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 81 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 18%
Professor 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 26 29%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 36 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,312,897
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,086
of 2,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,457
of 287,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#98
of 525 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 525 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.