| Title |
hα: the scientist as chimpanzee or bonobo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-019-03004-3 |
| Authors |
Loet Leydesdorff, Lutz Bornmann, Tobias Opthof |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 6 | 32% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Réunion | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Librarian | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 6 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 13 | 42% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 16% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,990,541
of 24,862,965 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#601
of 2,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,334
of 448,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#13
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,862,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.