| Title |
Effectiveness of a decision aid for promoting colorectal cancer screening in Spain: a randomized trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-019-0739-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lilisbeth Perestelo-Perez, Amado Rivero-Santana, Alezandra Torres-Castaño, Vanesa Ramos-Garcia, Yolanda Alvarez-Perez, Nerea Gonzalez-Hernandez, Andrea Buron, Michael Pignone, Pedro Serrano-Aguilar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Psychology | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 49 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,492,773
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#178
of 2,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,610
of 437,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#8
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,014 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.