| Title |
Use of the type A botulinum toxin in patients submitted to cheiloplasty to improve results in scarring in patients with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00238-018-1488-y |
| Authors |
David Felipe Navarro-Barquín, Edgard Efren Lozada-Hernández, Myriam Tejeda-Hernández, Gerardo Adrian DeLeon-Jasso, Freya Estefania Morales-Rescalvo, Eduardo Flores-González, Felipe Piña-Aviles |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 28% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 61% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,558,163
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#255
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,199
of 470,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Plastic Surgery
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 470,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.