| Title |
Marginal quality of ceramic inlays after three different instrumental cavity preparation methods of the proximal boxes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Oral Investigations, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00784-018-2492-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ella A. Naumova, Fabian Schiml, Wolfgang H. Arnold, Andree Piwowarczyk |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,323,762
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Oral Investigations
#51
of 1,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,089
of 329,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Oral Investigations
#2
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,441 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.