↓ Skip to main content

Effect of PCI on Quality of Life in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
593 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
338 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
2 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of PCI on Quality of Life in Patients with Stable Coronary Disease
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2008
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa072771
Pubmed ID
Authors

William S Weintraub, John A Spertus, Paul Kolm, David J Maron, Zefeng Zhang, Claudine Jurkovitz, Wei Zhang, Pamela M Hartigan, Cheryl Lewis, Emir Veledar, Jim Bowen, Sandra B Dunbar, Christi Deaton, Stanley Kaufman, Robert A O'Rourke, Ron Goeree, Paul G Barnett, Koon K Teo, William E Boden, G B J Mancini

Abstract

It has not been clearly established whether percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can provide an incremental benefit in quality of life over that provided by optimal medical therapy among patients with chronic coronary artery disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 338 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Japan 3 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 328 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 16%
Other 38 11%
Student > Master 32 9%
Student > Bachelor 31 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Other 80 24%
Unknown 76 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 172 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 92 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#955,886
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#9,350
of 32,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,937
of 94,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#29
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.