| Title |
Natural History of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation Implications of Quantitative Doppler Assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.021 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philipp E Bartko, Henrike Arfsten, Maria K Frey, Gregor Heitzinger, Noemi Pavo, Anna Cho, Stephanie Neuhold, Timothy C Tan, Guido Strunk, Christian Hengstenberg, Martin Hülsmann, Georg Goliasch |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 12% |
| Spain | 6 | 9% |
| Austria | 3 | 5% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 15% |
| Scientists | 10 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 22 | 22% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Linguistics | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 41 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2019.
All research outputs
#848,978
of 25,663,438 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#235
of 2,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,688
of 449,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#19
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,663,438 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.