↓ Skip to main content

Degradation of 100‐m‐Scale Rocky Ejecta Craters at the InSight Landing Site on Mars and Implications for Surface Processes and Erosion Rates in the Hesperian and Amazonian

Overview of attention for article published in JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: PLANETS, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Degradation of 100‐m‐Scale Rocky Ejecta Craters at the InSight Landing Site on Mars and Implications for Surface Processes and Erosion Rates in the Hesperian and Amazonian
Published in
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: PLANETS, October 2018
DOI 10.1029/2018je005618
Authors

J. Sweeney, N. H. Warner, V. Ganti, M. P. Golombek, M. P. Lamb, R. Fergason, R. Kirk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 25%
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 50%
Physics and Astronomy 3 19%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,276,445
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: PLANETS
#1,090
of 2,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,650
of 363,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH: PLANETS
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.