↓ Skip to main content

The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
363 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Global Burden of Cardiovascular Disease
Published in
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, June 2017
DOI 10.1016/s1474-5151(11)00111-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christi Deaton, Erika Sivaraja. Froelicher, Lai Ha. Wu, Camille Ho, Kawkab Shishani, Tiny Jaarsma

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) today is responsible for approximately one-third of deaths worldwide, and that figure will surely increase in both developing and developed countries as risk factors for the disease - primarily dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, physical inactivity, poor diet, and smoking - continue to increase. Although these risk factors are modifiable, to date there is a relative paucity of measures to prevent or control them, particularly in developing countries. A population strategy combined with a high-risk strategy for CVD prevention could greatly reduce the burden of disease in the coming decades. Many initiatives are working, but many more are needed. This chapter provides background on the global burden of CVD and provides the context for the subsequent chapters addressing nurses' roles in reversing the bleak predictions for the ravages of CVD if risk factors are left unchecked in the coming decades.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Spain 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 354 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 60 17%
Student > Bachelor 56 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 14%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Postgraduate 18 5%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 89 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 107 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 7%
Engineering 13 4%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 105 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#19,015,492
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#745
of 839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,193
of 317,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
#21
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.