| Title |
OncotypeDX Recurrence Score Does Not Predict Nodal Burden in Clinically Node Negative Breast Cancer Patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, December 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-018-7059-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. E. Tevis, R. Bassett, I. Bedrosian, C. H. Barcenas, D. M. Black, A. S. Caudle, S. M. DeSnyder, E. Fitzsullivan, K. K. Hunt, H. M. Kuerer, A. Lucci, F. Meric-Bernstam, E. A. Mittendorf, K. Park, M. Teshome, A. M. Thompson, R. F. Hwang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 48% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Turkey | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 33% |
| Scientists | 6 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,355,246
of 24,717,821 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#545
of 6,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,859
of 416,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#13
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,717,821 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.