| Title |
2D versus 3D laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a developmental multicentre randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-018-06630-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. J. Curtis, J. A. Conti, R. Dalton, T. A. Rockall, A. S. Allison, J. B. Ockrim, I. C. Jourdan, J. Torkington, S. Phillips, J. Allison, G. B. Hanna, N. K. Francis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 16% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,584,475
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#701
of 6,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,062
of 439,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#21
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.