↓ Skip to main content

A Systematic Review of the Bottom/Base of the Pyramid Literature: Cumulative Evidence and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
Title
A Systematic Review of the Bottom/Base of the Pyramid Literature: Cumulative Evidence and Future Directions
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04105-y
Authors

Krzysztof Dembek, Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam, Danielle A. Chmielewski

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 263 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 17%
Student > Master 38 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 17 6%
Researcher 16 6%
Other 41 16%
Unknown 87 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 99 38%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 4%
Engineering 9 3%
Environmental Science 5 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 101 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2019.
All research outputs
#6,799,780
of 25,205,261 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#1,046
of 3,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,351
of 450,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#17
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,003 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.