↓ Skip to main content

サイクリストによる多様な車道内自転車通行空間の安全感評価

Overview of attention for article published in JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
サイクリストによる多様な車道内自転車通行空間の安全感評価
Published in
JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering, April 2017
DOI 10.14954/jste.3.4_a_15
Authors

山中 英生, 原澤 拓也, 西本 拓弥

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#8,531,317
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering
#6
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,560
of 323,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JSTE Journal of Traffic Engineering
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one scored the same or higher as 38 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them