| Title |
Which is the best treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: balloon kyphoplasty, percutaneous vertebroplasty, or non-surgical treatment? A Bayesian network meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-018-4804-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
R.-S. Zhu, S.-L. Kan, G.-Z. Ning, L.-X. Chen, Z.-G. Cao, Z.-H. Jiang, X.-L. Zhang, W. Hu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 16% |
| Unknown | 25 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#14,901,763
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,270
of 3,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,255
of 437,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#35
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.