↓ Skip to main content

Neuroticism and psychopathy predict brain activation during moral and nonmoral emotion regulation

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Neuroticism and psychopathy predict brain activation during moral and nonmoral emotion regulation
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, March 2009
DOI 10.3758/cabn.9.1.1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carla L. Harenski, Sang Hee Kim, Stephan Hamann

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging has identified brain regions associated with voluntary regulation of emotion, including the prefrontal cortex and amygdala. The neural mechanisms underlying individual differences in emotion regulation have not been extensively studied. We investigated the neural correlates of neuroticism and psychopathic personality traits in the context of an emotion regulation task. Results showed that amygdala activity elicited by unpleasant pictures was positively correlated with neuroticism and negatively correlated with a specific psychopathic trait related to emotional underreactivity. During active attempts to decrease emotional responses to unpleasant pictures, superior and ventrolateral prefrontal activity was positively correlated with psychopathy, but not with neuroticism. In contrast, dorsolateral prefrontal activity was positively correlated with neuroticism, but not with psychopathy. Psychopathy was also negatively correlated with medial prefrontal activity in response to pictures depicting moral violations, suggesting reduced emotional responses to moral stimuli in individuals with high levels of psychopathic traits. These results demonstrate dissociable influences of different personality traits on neural activity associated with responses to emotional stimuli and on the recruitment of regulation-related brain activity during the active down-regulation of responses to negative emotional stimuli. These results have implications for the etiology of trait-based psychopathology involving emotional dysregulation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 8 3%
United States 3 1%
India 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 210 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 35 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 14%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 10%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 36 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 113 49%
Neuroscience 18 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Arts and Humanities 7 3%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 43 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,746,742
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#583
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,571
of 96,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.